Difference between revisions of "CodeNEXT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''CodeNEXT''' is Austin's first rewrite of its Land Development Code in three decades. It promised to allow more housing choice, more units by right, more walkability, smart growth management, missing middle housing, etc. But so far it seems to mostly be a recodification of existing standards with, if anything, residential entitlements being stripped away on net; to [http://www.aura-atx.org/codenext_mapping_reveals_near_fatal_flaws our read], missing middle remains pretty missing. This is disappointing given the clear recommendations from | + | '''CodeNEXT''' is Austin's first rewrite of its Land Development Code in three decades. It promised to allow more housing choice, more units by right, more walkability, smart growth management, missing middle housing, etc. But so far it seems to mostly be a recodification of existing standards with, if anything, residential entitlements being stripped away on net; to [http://www.aura-atx.org/codenext_mapping_reveals_near_fatal_flaws our read], missing middle remains pretty missing. This is disappointing given the clear recommendations from [https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/Housing_Development_Toolkit%20f.2.pdf this report from the Obama Whitehouse] |
The city's resources for the process and product are [http://www.austintexas.gov/department/codenext here]. This includes: | The city's resources for the process and product are [http://www.austintexas.gov/department/codenext here]. This includes: | ||
Revision as of 04:16, 15 May 2017
CodeNEXT is Austin's first rewrite of its Land Development Code in three decades. It promised to allow more housing choice, more units by right, more walkability, smart growth management, missing middle housing, etc. But so far it seems to mostly be a recodification of existing standards with, if anything, residential entitlements being stripped away on net; to our read, missing middle remains pretty missing. This is disappointing given the clear recommendations from this report from the Obama Whitehouse
The city's resources for the process and product are here. This includes:
- Comparison maps -- make comments on the maps here
- Comment Tool -- make comments on the code text here
- Zoning Framework Table
- Transect Zones Matrix
- Affordability Code Talk, presentation and panel with pro-housing experts
A lot of the necessary work of making sense of the code has fallen to housing advocates:
- Chris Bradford's excellent high-level overview of CodeNEXT's transect zone paradigm
- Robert Foster: "The Promises and Failures of CodeNEXT"
