Difference between revisions of "LMDR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''LMDR''' is one of the new Nontransect Zones. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
!Comment || Page/Section | !Comment || Page/Section | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Remove 80' 1-story limitation. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | + | | Remove 80' 1-story limitation. Among other things, it would disallow two-story [[ADUs]] at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Remove | + | | Remove 15' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement|| | + | | '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it || | + | | There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 01:38, 19 May 2017
LMDR is one of the new Nontransect Zones. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at 23-4D 3090.
Recommendations
| Comment | Page/Section |
|---|---|
| Remove 80' 1-story limitation. Among other things, it would disallow two-story ADUs at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU. | 23-4D 3090 |
| Remove 15' front setback | 23-4D 3090 |
| At very least Clarify that less restrictive of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement | 23-4D 3090 |
| There should be no FAR limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it. | 23-4D 3090 |
