Difference between revisions of "CodeNEXT"

From AURAWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* [http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/CodeNEXT/zoningframeworktablesupdate042017.pdf Zoning Framework Table]
 
* [http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/CodeNEXT/zoningframeworktablesupdate042017.pdf Zoning Framework Table]
 
* [http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/CodeNEXT/ALDC_TransectMatrix_PUBLIC_REVIEW_DRAFT_021617.pdf Transect Zones Matrix]
 
* [http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/CodeNEXT/ALDC_TransectMatrix_PUBLIC_REVIEW_DRAFT_021617.pdf Transect Zones Matrix]
 +
* [http://austintexas.gov/codenext/housing Affordability Code Talk], presentation and panel with pro-housing experts
 +
 +
A lot of the necessary work of making sense of the code has fallen to housing advocates:
 +
* [http://www.austincontrarian.com/austincontrarian/2017/02/a-codenext-explainer-part-1-transects-and-the-form-based-code.html Chris Bradford's excellent high-level overview] of CodeNEXT's transect zone paradigm
 +
* [https://medium.com/@robert.m.fostr/the-promises-and-failures-of-codenext-69a2693fc942 Robert Foster: "The Promises and Failures of CodeNEXT"]
 +
  
  

Revision as of 01:17, 14 May 2017

CodeNEXT is Austin's first rewrite of its Land Development Code in three decades. It promised to allow more housing choice, more units by right, more walkability, smart growth management, missing middle housing, etc. But so far it seems to mostly be a recodification of existing standards with, if anything, residential entitlements being stripped away on net; to our read, missing middle remains pretty missing.

The city's resources for the process and product are here. This includes:

A lot of the necessary work of making sense of the code has fallen to housing advocates:


Specifics