Difference between revisions of "Breweries"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Brewpubs et al should be allowed anywhere that restaurants are allowed. || | + | | Brewpubs (bars) et al should be allowed anywhere that restaurants are allowed without burdensome conditional use restrictions. City law ordinances on noise and nuisance should overrule land use code. || |
| − | pdf pg | + | pdf pg 153 |
|- | |- | ||
| Breweries et al should be allowed anywhere light industrial is located. || | | Breweries et al should be allowed anywhere light industrial is located. || | ||
| − | pdf pg | + | pdf pg 153 |
|- | |- | ||
| Don’t limit tasting area, this is important sales tax revenue and tourist attraction. || | | Don’t limit tasting area, this is important sales tax revenue and tourist attraction. || | ||
Revision as of 02:21, 8 June 2017
Breweries and brewpubs are an important amenity and business in Austin. They generate much sales tax revenue and sought-after by both locals and tourists.
The Problem
A conditional use permit (CUP) is required if brewery/brewpub closer than 540’ from a SFH.
CodeNEXT unnecessarily limits micro-breweries/distilleries/wineries.
Recommendations
| Comment | PDF page #
|
|---|---|
| Brewpubs (bars) et al should be allowed anywhere that restaurants are allowed without burdensome conditional use restrictions. City law ordinances on noise and nuisance should overrule land use code. |
pdf pg 153 |
| Breweries et al should be allowed anywhere light industrial is located. |
pdf pg 153 |
| Don’t limit tasting area, this is important sales tax revenue and tourist attraction. |
pdf pg
|
