Difference between revisions of "Nontransect Zones"
Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
|| 5 | || 5 | ||
|| 35 | || 35 | ||
− | | | + | || |
|- | |- | ||
Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
|| 5 | || 5 | ||
|| 40 | || 40 | ||
− | | no | + | || no |
Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
|| 5 | || 5 | ||
|| 60 | || 60 | ||
− | | | + | || No |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ![[RC]] | ||
+ | | Regional Commercial | ||
+ | | new | ||
+ | | Commercial, service, office. Slight restrictions on uses, commensurate with the added intensity | ||
+ | | HOMES NOT ALLOWED | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 5,750 sf | ||
+ | | 95% | ||
+ | | 90% | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | || 5 | ||
+ | || 60 | ||
+ | || No | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ![[CC]] | ||
+ | | Commercial Core | ||
+ | | Downzone from DMU | ||
+ | | A variety of retail, retaurant, employment, civic, medical, office, mixed use. More | ||
+ | restrictive than Regional Commercial regarding auto and service uses. | ||
+ | | unlimited | ||
+ | | 5 (wtf?) | ||
+ | | n/a | ||
+ | | 95% | ||
+ | | 95% | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | || 5 | ||
+ | || 120 | ||
+ | || No | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ![[DC]] | ||
+ | | Downtown Core | ||
+ | | CBD | ||
+ | | A variety of retail, retaurant, employment, civic, medical, office, mixed use. More | ||
+ | restrictive than Regional Commercial regarding auto and service uses. | ||
+ | | unlimited | ||
+ | | 8 (wtf?) | ||
+ | | n/a | ||
+ | | 100% | ||
+ | | 100% | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | || 0 | ||
+ | || unlimited (but practically constrained by the very low FAR limit of 8 | ||
+ | || No | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 03:04, 23 May 2017
Nontransect Zones are the proposed new use-based ("Euclidian") zoning paradigm under CodeNEXT. These zones primarily specify the allowed uses of the property and have secondary restrictions on the form of the buildings.
Consultants and staff have generally said that this paradigm is designed more for "driveable suburban" areas, with transect zones for "walkable urban" areas. This distinction seems strange looking at the actual text and maps -- the DC and CC nontransect zones do foster a high degree of walkability, while the T3 family of transect zones does not allow enough density to support walkable neighborhoods.
Details
In progress. See also:
- City's breakdown (PDF, source for this table)
- Google Spreadsheet Table of uses by Matthew Duarte
Zone | Full Name | Similar Old Code Zones | Uses | Density | Intensity (FAR) | Min Lot Size | Max Impervious Cover | Max Building Cover | Min Setbacks | Height | ADU? | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front | Side Street | Side Interior | Back | |||||||||||
RR | Rural Residential | RR | Single Family Detached | 1 acre | 25% | 20% | 40 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 35 | No | ||
VLDR | Very Low Density residential | SF1 | Single Family Detached | 10,000 sf | 40% | 35% | 25 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 35 | |||
LDR | Low Density residential | SF2 | Single Family Detached | 5,750 sf | 45% | 40% | 25 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 35 | |||
LMDR | Low-Medium Density residential | SF3, SF4B | Single Family Detached, Duplex | 5,750 sf | 45% | 40% | 15 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 35 | |||
LMDR-SL | Low-Medium Density Residential - Small Lot | SF4A | Single Family Detached, Duplex | 3,600 sf | 65% | 55% | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 35 | |||
MDR | Medium Density Residential | SF5, SF6 | Duplex/Townhome | 12 du/ac | 5,750 sf | 55% | 40% | 15 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 35 | ||
MHDR | Medium-High Density Residential | MF1, MF2 | Small Multifamily | 18 du/ac | 8,000 sf | 60% | 50% | 15 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 40 | ||
HDR | "High" Density Residential | MF3, MF4 (downzone from MF4) | Multifamily + services | 24 du/ac | 8,000 sf | 70% | 60% | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 60 | ||
VHDR | "Very High" Density Residential | MF5, MF6 (big downzone from MF6) | Multifamily + services | 54 du/ac | 8,000 sf | 80% | 70% | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 90 | ||
MHP | Manufactured Home Park | MH | Manufactured Home Parks |
| ||||||||||
NC | Neighborhood Commercial | NO, downzone from LO, downzone from LR (+"MU" for Open subzone) | Limited retail office, medical office, limited services ("open" subz also allows 2-3 story residential and mixed use, incl townhomes) | 12 du/ac (open subz only) | 0.5 | 5,750 sf | 60% | 40% | 20 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 35 | |
LC | Local Commercial | GO (GO-MU for Open) | Limited commercial, service, office, and medical, excluding uses such as auto sales/repair, restricted services, storage, recreation ("open" subz also allows 2-3 story residential and mixed use, incl townhomes) | 18 du/ac (open subz only) | 1 | 5,750 sf | 80% | 60% | 15 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 40 | no
|
GC | General Commercial | GR (downzone from GR-MU for Open) | General Commercial including auto, service type uses not allowed in LC ("open" subz also allows residential and mixed use, incl townhomes) | 36 du/ac (open subz only) | 1 | 5,750 sf | 90% | 75% | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 60 | No
|
RC | Regional Commercial | new | Commercial, service, office. Slight restrictions on uses, commensurate with the added intensity | HOMES NOT ALLOWED | 2 | 5,750 sf | 95% | 90% | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 60 | No
|
CC | Commercial Core | Downzone from DMU | A variety of retail, retaurant, employment, civic, medical, office, mixed use. More
restrictive than Regional Commercial regarding auto and service uses. |
unlimited | 5 (wtf?) | n/a | 95% | 95% | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 120 | No
|
DC | Downtown Core | CBD | A variety of retail, retaurant, employment, civic, medical, office, mixed use. More
restrictive than Regional Commercial regarding auto and service uses. |
unlimited | 8 (wtf?) | n/a | 100% | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | unlimited (but practically constrained by the very low FAR limit of 8 | No
|