Difference between revisions of "LMDR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR)''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. It allows single-family houses, [[duplexes]], and [[ADUs]]. It is meant to be closest to [[SF-3]] in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest [[Transect | + | '''Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR)''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. It allows single-family houses, [[duplexes]], and [[ADUs]]. It is meant to be closest to [[SF-3]] in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest [[Transect Zones]] are the [[T3]] family. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]. |
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Remove 80' 1-story limitation. Among other things, it would disallow two-story [[ADUs]] at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | | Remove 80' 1-story limitation. Among other things, it would disallow two-story [[ADUs]] at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Remove 15' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | + | | Shorten 20' rear setback to 5' or remove it entirely. The 20' rear setback is a significant obstacle for ADUs at the rear of the lot || |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Increase height from 2 stories to 3 stories, at least in the urban core. Nowhere in the urban core should be capped at two stories. || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Reduce or Remove 15' front setback. This is ''in addition'' to the 10' setback for ROW. 25' total is excessive as a minimum. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | | '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
| Nothing called "low medium density residential" -- and certainly nothing like this zone -- should be anywhere in the urban core. || | | Nothing called "low medium density residential" -- and certainly nothing like this zone -- should be anywhere in the urban core. || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | || |
| + | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:20, 20 May 2017
Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR) is one of the new Nontransect Zones. It allows single-family houses, duplexes, and ADUs. It is meant to be closest to SF-3 in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest Transect Zones are the T3 family. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at 23-4D 3090.
Recommendations
| Comment | Page/Section |
|---|---|
| Remove 80' 1-story limitation. Among other things, it would disallow two-story ADUs at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU. | 23-4D 3090 |
| Shorten 20' rear setback to 5' or remove it entirely. The 20' rear setback is a significant obstacle for ADUs at the rear of the lot | |
| Increase height from 2 stories to 3 stories, at least in the urban core. Nowhere in the urban core should be capped at two stories. | |
| Reduce or Remove 15' front setback. This is in addition to the 10' setback for ROW. 25' total is excessive as a minimum. | 23-4D 3090 |
| At very least Clarify that less restrictive of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement | 23-4D 3090 |
| There should be no FAR limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it. | 23-4D 3090 |
| Nothing called "low medium density residential" -- and certainly nothing like this zone -- should be anywhere in the urban core. | |
