LMDR - Revision history

Josiah: /* Recommendations */

2017-05-20T20:20:19Z

Recommendations

Josiah: /* Recommendations */

2017-05-20T17:36:10Z

Recommendations

Josiah: /* Recommendations */

2017-05-20T17:29:48Z

Recommendations

Josiah at 01:50, 19 May 2017

2017-05-19T01:50:56Z

Josiah at 01:50, 19 May 2017

2017-05-19T01:50:38Z

Josiah: /* Recommendations */

2017-05-19T01:40:42Z

Recommendations

Josiah: /* Recommendations */

2017-05-19T01:38:45Z

Recommendations

Josiah: Created page with "'''LMDR''' is one of the new Nontransect Zones. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23..."

2017-05-19T01:05:27Z

Created page with "'''LMDR''' is one of the new Nontransect Zones. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23..."

New page

'''LMDR''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090].

== Recommendations ==

{| class=wikitable

!Comment || Page/Section
|-
| Remove 80' 1-story limitation. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
|-
| Remove 25' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
|-
| '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove the 2300sf requirement||
|-
| There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it ||
|-
|
|}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 | Increase height from 2 stories to 3 stories, at least in the urban core. Nowhere in the urban core should be capped at two stories. ||
 |-
-| Remove 15' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
+| Reduce or Remove 15' front setback. This is ''in addition'' to the 10' setback for ROW. 25' total is excessive as a minimum. || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
 | '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove  the 2300sf requirement || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |-
 | Remove 80' 1-story limitation.  Among other things, it would disallow two-story [[ADUs]] at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU.  ||  [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
 | Remove 15' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
@@ Line 17: / Line 21: @@
 |-
 | Nothing called "low medium density residential" -- and certainly nothing like this zone -- should be anywhere in the urban core. ||
+|-
 |}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |-
 | Nothing called "low medium density residential" -- and certainly nothing like this zone -- should be anywhere in the urban core. ||
-|-
-−
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 19 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR)''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. It allows single-family houses, [[duplexes]], and [[ADUs]]. It is meant to be closest to [[SF-3]] in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest [[Transect ~~Zone~~]]s are the [[T3]] family. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090].	+	'''Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR)''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. It allows single-family houses, [[duplexes]], and [[ADUs]]. It is meant to be closest to [[SF-3]] in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest [[Transect Zones]] are the [[T3]] family. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090].

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 19 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''LMDR''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090].	+	'''Low-Medium Density Residential (LMDR)''' is one of the new [[Nontransect Zones]]. It allows single-family houses, [[duplexes]], and [[ADUs]]. It is meant to be closest to [[SF-3]] in the old code, but many advocates believe it represents a significant downzoning from SF-3. The closest [[Transect Zone]]s are the [[T3]] family. Unfortunately, it was mapped over much of the urban core. LMDR is described at [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090].

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 |-
 | There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it.  || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
+|
 |}

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 !Comment || Page/Section
 |-
-| Remove 80' 1-story limitation.  ||  [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
+| Remove 80' 1-story limitation.  Among other things, it would disallow two-story [[ADUs]] at the back of the lot and seriously limit the total possible area of an ADU.  ||  [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
-| Remove 25' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
+| Remove 15' front setback || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
-| '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove  the 2300sf requirement||
+| '''At very least''' Clarify that '''less restrictive''' of 2300sf and .4 FAR should apply, and/or remove  the 2300sf requirement || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
-| There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it ||
+| There should be no [[FAR]] limits. It is redundant given impervious cover and height limits and there is no policy rationale to care about it.  || [https://codenext.civicomment.org/chapter-23-4-zoning-code#p220 23-4D 3090]
 |-
+|
 |}